Friday, September 24, 2010
Friday food for thought
Wednesday, September 22, 2010
It gets better
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
The creepy cashier and lessons in a heteronormative society
I waited in line at the grocery store as the middle-old aged clerk (65-70 years old) struck up this conversation with the young daughter (~6 years old) of a woman buying groceries ahead of me:
Girl: No. [giggles, looks away.]
Now, I laughed too. The clerk was just silly. The girl was predictable. The mother was amused. And I got to thinking, would people have reacted this way had the girl instead been a boy? What if the elder clerk was in fact a homosexual, and thus innocently struck up the same conversation with the woman's son. I doubt anyone (I included) would have acted the same way. People would say, "Oh, how dare he try to make her son GAY!" "God, he's such a creepy molester!" "What is he, a Catholic priest or something?" In other words, they are afraid of such behavior, because it might influence the boy. It might shatter his world view of boys + girls = love. Quite simply, when the heterosexual "norm" of our society is enforced, even by slightly creepy, but good-natured clerks, we all laugh and move on. Because we think that society is grooming everyone to be either gay or straight. Straight is ok. Gay? No homo.
I doubt it's so straightforward that society's influences play such a large role. If they did, we wouldn't have had people identify with homosexuality in the dark ages of sexual identity (pre-gay rights/civil rights movement, which is by the way ongoing: see the link above).
I hope my (future) children grow up in a world that embraces both the straight and the gay clerk. I have enough faith they will know how to figure out their own sexual identity, regardless of some old grocery store clerk's influence.
Wednesday, September 01, 2010
Kids and antipsychotics
I read bits and pieces of the “Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV” (DSM-IV) during medical school, which was an informative yet frustrating experience: one that I would like to revisit and expand upon when DSM-V is released. My understanding of psychiatric illnesses and their diagnoses and treatments is extremely limited. I can only imagine how difficult it is to care for some psychiatric patients, let alone, children.
Enter Kyle. The NYTimes paints a grim portrait of his struggle with antipsychotic drugs:
“Kyle’s third birthday photo shows a pink-cheeked boy who had ballooned to 49 pounds.”
“Kyle smiles at the camera. He is sedated.”
“He was sedated, drooling and overweight…”
Kyle isn’t alone.
“Texas Medicaid data ... showed a record $96 million was spent last year on antipsychotic drugs for teenagers and children — including three unidentified infants who were given the drugs before their first birthdays.”
Kyle and other children from low-income families “were four times as likely as the privately insured to receive antipsychotic medicines” because it is “cheaper” than psychotherapy, according to a Rutgers U. study.
I wonder what things are like in the prison systems.